02 Mar Repudiation of an Employment Contract
Repudiation of an Employment Contract in Australia: Meaning, Examples and Outcomes
When an employment relationship breaks down, most disputes focus on remedies such as unfair dismissal, general protections or underpayment claims. Less commonly discussed is the repudiation of the employment contract.
Repudiation arises where one party’s words or conduct objectively show they have fundamentally departed from the contract or that they are unwilling or unable to perform essential obligations under the contract.
What is repudiation?
Repudiation is assessed objectively. An actual and subjective intention to repudiate the contract is not required. The focus is whether the conduct would convey to a reasonable person in the other party’s position that the defaulting party will not perform the contract or will only perform it in a way substantially inconsistent with the contract.
Justice Brennan in Laurinda Pty Ltd v Capalaba Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd [1989] HCA 23 is often cited for the test: “…it is to be found in the conduct, whether verbal or other, of the party in default which conveys to the other party the defaulting party’s inability to perform the contract or promise or his intention not to perform it or to fulfil it only in a manner substantially inconsistent with his obligations and not in any other way”
In Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 61, the High Court described two common uses of the term “repudiation”:
- Conduct showing an unwillingness or inability to render substantial performance of the contract; or
- A breach sufficiently serious to justify termination by the other party.
What can count as repudiatory conduct?
Repudiation can take many forms. Examples include:
- Express refusal: a verbal or written statement that the party will not comply with one or more terms of the contract.
- Objective conduct: conduct that a reasonable person would view as showing an intention not to be bound by the contract.
- Impossibility: circumstances where substantial performance of the contract has become impossible.
- Wrong interpretation: insisting on an objectively incorrect interpretation of the contract.
- Course of conduct: a combination of events and conduct that, viewed as a whole, shows an unwillingness or inability to perform essential obligations under the contract.
How does repudiation arise in the employment context?
In employment disputes, repudiation commonly arises where one party alleges the other has departed from core contractual terms such as remuneration, duties or fundamental workplace obligations. The outcome is always fact-specific, but the following scenarios are illustrative.
1) Unilateral variations to pay or withdrawal of contractual benefits
A unilateral reduction or variation in remuneration contrary to the employment contract will often be repudiatory.
In the case of Benge & Anor v Bluescope Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd (No.2) [2020] FCCA 515 (Benge Case), the Federal Circuit Court of Australia found:
- By removing pre-paid overtime from the Applicants’ employment contracts, the Respondent repudiated the Applicants’ contracts of employment.
- The Applicants continued their employment under the employment contracts, which meant that they were still entitled to be paid the pre-paid overtime component.
- The Applicants’ continued employment after 10 January 2016 did not constitute consent to the removal of pre-paid overtime from their employment contracts.
In the Benge Case, the Court’s summary of points of law on repudiation included:
- A repudiatory breach does not bring the employment contract to an end. The innocent party does not have to accept the repudiation.
- A unilateral reduction in the employee’s remuneration, or a threat to do so in the future, is almost always a serious breach and a repudiation of the contract of employment.
- Where an employer unilaterally reduces the employee’s remuneration, and repudiates and breaches the contract of employment, by not consenting to the variation, the employee can recover the total wages they should have been paid under the original contract.
Further information on the Benge Case is available at the link here.
2) Major loss of status, seniority, or responsibilities
Repudiation may arise where an employer substantially diminishes an employee’s status or responsibilities, particularly where those matters are essential to the bargain reflected in the employment contract.
Australian cases have applied repudiation principles to significant reductions in responsibilities or status (see, for example, Earney v Australian Property Investment Strategic Pty Ltd [2010] VSC 621).
Importantly, a significant diminution in status or responsibility may occur even if the employee’s title and salary remain the same. However, not every substantial change to duties will amount to repudiation—context, contractual terms, and the overall impact of the change matter.
3) Repudiation by employee misconduct
Repudiation is not limited to employer conduct. Serious employee misconduct may also constitute repudiation. In Gelagotis v Esso Australia Pty Ltd (t/as Esso) [2018] FWCFB 6092, the Fair Work Commission Full Bench considered that serious misconduct involving verbal abuse, intimidation, and harassment (in breach of employer policies) may be repudiatory in nature.
4) Flow-on consequences (including restraints)
Repudiation can affect related contractual rights and obligations. In some cases, conduct amounting to repudiation (or the way a contract is terminated) can have consequences for post-employment restraint clauses and other continuing obligations.
What happens if an employment contract is repudiated?
Repudiation does not automatically terminate an employment contract.
Where repudiatory conduct occurs, the other party must generally elect either to:
- treat the contract as continuing; or
- accept the repudiation and terminate the contract.
That choice does not always need to be made immediately. In Sargent v ASL Developments Ltd [1974] HCA 40, Mason J explained that a party confronted with inconsistent rights is not necessarily bound to make an election at once and may keep the question open, provided they do not affirm the contract and the delay does not cause prejudice to the other side.
Frequently asked questions
Can a pay cut be repudiation?
Potentially a pay cut can be repudiation. This is especially so if the pay cut is unilateral. The assessment may depends on the terms of the contract and the circumstances.
Can changing duties or demoting an employee be repudiation?
It can be. A substantial reduction in status or responsibilities may be repudiatory, even if title and salary stay the same. However, not every major change will amount to repudiation. Courts look at the overall context and the contractual bargain.
Does repudiation automatically end employment?
No. Repudiation does not automatically terminate the contract. The other party must elect to affirm the contract or accept the repudiation and terminate.
Conclusion
- Repudiation is assessed objectively and focuses on conduct, not subjective intention.
- In employment disputes, repudiation often arises from unilateral pay changes, major reductions in status or duties or serious misconduct.
- Repudiation does not end the contract automatically—the other party must elect to affirm or terminate.
GENERAL AND CONTACT INFORMATION
The article, the content and references made are intended to keep an audience updated with information. It is not intended that the article or part of it should be relied upon as advice. Information provided may not apply to in all circumstances or in particular situations. If you do want particular advice , we welcome you to contact us on (02) 9189 5905 or at general@cdclaw.com.au.